大学英语初级听力文本Unit1819.doc
《大学英语初级听力文本Unit1819.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学英语初级听力文本Unit1819.doc(17页珍藏版)》请在课桌文档上搜索。
1、 Lesson 18Energy Crisis(能源危机)Host (Michael Parkhurst): Good evening, and wele again to the Michael Parkhurst Talkabout. In tonights programme, were looking at the problem of energy. The worlds energy resources are limited. Nobody knows exactly how much fuel is left, but pessimistic forecasts say tha
2、t there is only enough coal for 450 years, enough natural gas for 50 years and that oil might run out in 30 years. Obviously we have to do something, and we have to do it soon! Id like to wele our first guest, Professor Marvin Burnham of the New England Institute of Technology. Professor Burnham. Pr
3、of. Burnham: Well, we are in an energy crisis and we will have to do something quickly. Fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) are rapidly running out. The tragedy is that fossil fuels are far too valuable to waste on the production of electricity. Just think of all the things you can make from oil! If we
4、 dont start conserving these things now, it will be too late. And nuclear power is the only real alternative. We are getting some electricity from nuclear power stations already. If we invest in further research now, well be ready to face the future. Theres been a lot of protest lately against nucle
5、ar powersome people will protest at anythingbut nuclear power stations are not as dangerous as some people say. Its far more dangerous to work down a coal mine or on a North Sea oil-rig. Safety regulations in power stations are very strict. If we spent money on research now, we could develop station
6、s which create their own fuel and burn their own waste. In many parts of the world where there are no fossil fuels, nuclear power is the only alternative. If you accept that we need electricity, then we will need nuclear energy. Just imagine what the world would be like if we didnt have electricityn
7、o heating, no lighting, no transport, no radio or TV. Just think about the ways you use electricity every day. Surely we dont want to go back to the Stone Age. Thats what will happen if we turn our backs on nuclear research. Host: Thank you, Professor. Our next guest is a member of CANE, the Campaig
8、n Against Nuclear Energy, Jennifer Hughes. Jennifer Hughes: Right. I must disagree totally with Professor Burnham. Lets look at the facts. First, there is no perfect machine. I mean, why do aeroplanes crash? Machines fail. People make mistakes. What would happen if there were a serious nuclear accid
9、ent? And an accident must be inevitablesooner or later. Huge areas would be evacuated. And they could remain contaminated with radioactivity for years. If it happened in your area, you wouldnt get a penny in pensation. No insurance pany covers nuclear risks. There are accidents. If the nuclear indus
10、try didnt keep them quiet, there would be a public outcry. Radioactivity causes cancer and may affect future generations. Next, nuclear waste. There is no technology for absolutely safe disposal. Some of this waste will remain active for thousands of years. Is that what you want to leave to your chi
11、ldren? And their childrens children? A reactor only lasts about 25 years. By the year 2000 well have retired 26 reactors in the UK. Next, terrorism. Terrorists could hold the nation to ransom if they captured a reactor. In the USA the Savannah River plant, and Professor Burnham knows this very well,
12、 lost (yes, lost) enough plutonium between 1955 and 1978 to make 18 (18!) atom bombs. Where is it? Whos got it? I consider that nuclear energy is expensive, dangerous, and evil, and most of all, absolutely unnecessary. But Dr. Woodstock will be saying more about that. Host: Thank you Jennifer. Now I
13、m very pleased to wele Dr. Catherine Woodstock. She is the author of several books on alternative technology. Catherine Woodstock: Hello. Id like to begin by agreeing with Jennifer. We can develop alternative sources of power, and unless we try well never succeed. Instead of burning fossil fuels we
14、should be concentrating on more economic uses of electricity, because electricity can be produced from any source of energy. If we didnt waste so much energy, our resources would last longer. You can save more energy by conservation than you can produce for the same money. Unless we do research on s
15、olar energy, wind power, wave power, tidal power, hydroelectric schemes etc, our fossil fuels will run out, and well all freeze or starve to death. Other countries are spending much more than us on research, and dont forget that energy from the sun, the waves and the wind lasts for ever. We really w
16、ont survive unless we start working on cleaner, safer sources of energy. Host: Thank you very much, Dr. Woodstock. Our final speaker, before we open the discussion to the studio audience, is Charles Wicks, MP, the Minister for Energy. Charles Wicks: Ive been listening to the other speakers with grea
17、t interest. By the way, I dont agree with some of the estimates of world energy reserves. More oil and gas is being discovered all the time. If we listened to the pessimists (and there are a lot of them about) none of us would sleep at night. In the short term, we must continue to rely on the fossil
18、 fuelsoil, coal and gas. But we must also look to the future. Our policy must be flexible. Unless we thought new research was necessary, we wouldnt be spending money on it. After all, the Government wouldnt have a Department of Energy unless they thought it was important. The big question is where t
19、o spend the moneyon conservation of present resources or on research into new forms of power. But Im fairly optimistic. I wouldnt be in this job unless I were an optimist!Task 1: The Years to e (I)Mal Carrington: Good morning. Wele to The years to e. Im Mal Carrington, and every week at this time Ch
20、annel 5 brings you information on life in the future from an expert in the field. Todays expert is Dr Reginald Healy from MIT, the famous Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Good morning, Dr Healy. Wele to The years to e. Dr Healy: Thank you. Mal Carrington: Well, what are your predictions about
21、the world? What is it going to be like in the year 2000? Dr Healy: Hum, if present trends continue, Im afraid the world in 2000 will be more crowded and more polluted than the world we live in now. Mal Carrington: Yes, however, food production is constantly increasing. Dont you think we will be able
22、 to cope with the increase in world population? Dr Healy: I dont think so. Even though production is constantly increasing, the people of the world will be poorer than they are today. For hundreds of millions of the desperately poor, the supply of food and other necessities of life will not be any b
23、etter. And for many they will be worse, unless the nations of the world do something to change the current trends. Mal Carrington: What is your estimate of world population in AD 2000. Dr Healy: Well, already, world population is about 5,000 million. If present trends continue, that is with the numb
24、er of births by far exceeding the number of deaths in 2000 the world population could approach 6,500 million people. Mal Carrington: How many people are born every day? Dr Healy: About 250 every minute, but only 100 people die. This means there is an increase of 216,000 people per day, and ninety pe
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 英语 初级 听力 文本 Unit1819

链接地址:https://www.desk33.com/p-9922.html